Genes, Giants, Monsters, and Men: The Surviving Elites of the Cosmic War and Their Hidden Agenda Read online

  Table of Contents

  Title Page

  Acknowledgements

  Introduction

  I. - POST-BELLUM AFTERMATH:

  One - KOLDEWEY’S CONUNDRUM AND DELITZSCH’S DILEMMA

  A. KOLDEWEY’S CONUNDRUM: THE SIRRUSH

  B. DELITZSCH’S DILEMMA: BABEL UND BIBEL

  Two - MARDUK MEASURED THE STRUCTURE OF THE DEEP:

  A. AN OXFORD PROFESSOR OVERTURNS THE STANDARD MODEL: ALEXANDER THOM, HIS WORK, ...

  B. THE HIDDEN ELITE AND THE COSMIC WAR SCENARIO

  C. THE COSMIC WAR: MARDUK MEASURED THE STRUCTURE OF THE DEEP

  D. CONCLUSIONS

  Three - THE TECHNOLOGIES OF SPECIAL REVELATION:

  A. DAVID KORESH HEARS THE VOICE OF GOD... OR WAS IT JUST CHARLTON HESTON?

  B. THE MIND MANIPULATORS: MIND MANIPULATION TECHNOLOGIES

  C. THE TORSION TEMPLES OF ANTIQUITY: A PRIMITIVE TECHNOLOGY OF COMMUNICATION ...

  D. THE RELIGION REVEALERS: O’BRIEN’S TECHNOLOGICAL CONSIDERATION OF THE ...

  Four - ELITE WITH AGENDAS:

  II. - GENES AND GIANTS, OR,

  Five - THE GENOME WARS:

  A. AN OVERVIEW OF THE MODERN GENOME WAR: THE RACE BETWEEN THE HUMAN GENOME ...

  B. TECHNOLOGIES AND LEGALITIES

  C. THE POTENTIALITIES OF GENETIC ENGINEERING

  D. THE “MESOPOTAMIAN” GENOME WAR: THE O’BRIENS AGAIN

  Six - A CONNECTION OF MISCELLANIES:

  A. THE CODES WITHIN THE CODE

  B. BACK TO THE TABLETS OF DESTINIES

  C. GIANTS, AND “THE ARCHAEOLOGY CONSPIRACY”

  D. CONCLUSIONS: TAKING STOCK THUS FAR

  III. - MONSTERS AND MEN

  Seven - THE RETURN OF THE SIRRUSH:

  A. GREEKS, GIANTS, MONSTERS, AND WAR

  B. INDIANS, GIANTS, MONSTERS, AND WAR

  Eight - A MEMORY OF MAN PAST:

  A. MITOCHONDRIAL EVE AND HER SEVEN EUROPEAN DAUGHTERS

  B. EVOLUTIONARY CHRONOLOGY OF THE ORIGINS OF MAN AND THE CHRONOLOGICAL PROBLEM

  C. CHRONOLOGICAL RESOLUTIONS AND AGENDAS: SOME SPECULATIONS

  BIBLIOGRAPHY

  Copyright Page

  “I think we’re property.

  I should say we belong to something:

  That once upon a time, this earth was No-man’s Land,

  that other worlds explored and colonized here,

  and fought among themselves for possession,

  but that now it’s owned by something:

  That something owns this earth — all others warned off.

  ...

  “I suspect... that all of this has been known, perhaps for ages,

  to certain ones upon this earth, a cult or order,

  members of which function like bellwethers to the rest of us,

  or as superior slaves or overseers, directing us in accordance

  with instructions received — from Somewhere else —

  in our mysterious usefulness.”

  — Charles Fort, The Book of the Damned, 1919, p. 163

  Above all, to

  SCOTT DOUGLAS de HART:

  A true master, adept, and poet of deep mysteries,

  who crossed the Rubicon with me:

  Anything I could say, any gratitude I could express,

  are simply inadequate for you;

  You are a true

  And to

  TRACY S. FISHER:

  You are, and will always be, sorely missed.

  ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

  Every book such as this one is the product of that intricate calculus of human interaction. It is the offspring of conversations between close friends with common interests and outlooks, of “conversations” with books written long ago by authors long forgotten, who yet in the immediacy of the media of information are ever present to us.

  This book is no different. The authors from long ago and more recent times are encountered in its main text, but the conversations had with friends who have in their own way contributed to many of the insights of this book are a different matter, and these people must be mentioned. George Ann Hughes and I have known each other for about three years through her Internet broadcast, The Byte Show. What began as a professional relationship has morphed into a friendship where the free flow of ideas is always paramount, and many of her insights are recorded herein. Thank you, George Ann.

  The same, likewise, must be said for my friend Richard C. Hoagland, who also over many emails and phone calls these past two years has made his own observations and contributions to this book, particularly in how space anomalies fit into the larger picture. I hope I have done some justice to his thoughts here. Thank you, Richard.

  Above all there has been one friend, Dr. Scott D. deHart, whose constancy as a friend in some of the darkest periods of my life has been unwavering, and whose conversations over this last third of my life that I have had the honor and privilege of knowing him, have so mightily contributed to the ideas presented herein that in truth, he is a co-author and equal contributor to it. Many of the ideas, particularly in the last two parts of the book, are reflective of conversations we’ve had over the past decade. For him and for these conversations and his friendship, and in many cases mentorship, no words of gratitude suffice, but nonetheless I say it anyway: thank you, Scott.

  Joseph P. Farrell

  Spearfish, South Dakota

  2010

  Introduction

  HOW DOES ONE MAKE SENSE of ancient texts, modern genetics, legends of monsters and giants, fossils, the origins of man, and the attempts of some religions, to obscure all of it? How does one synthesize it all? Is it even possible to speak in one breath of giants, monsters, ancient texts and evolution?

  Asking these questions highlights the problem, and the problem is the texts, what we mean by them, and what we think they mean.

  Pretty much everyone with half a brain, and who has not been lobotomized by the American “education” system or subjected to the psychedelic drugs and mind-numbing electroshock of its dull university curricula, even duller professors, and to its “textbooks” that contain no primary texts, is agreed that something is wrong with our standard model of history, particularly the farther back one goes. Only a university academic, for example, could believe that humanity was around for about 150,000 years (if one is to believe the geneticists), and doing nothing but “hunting and gathering,” and then all of a sudden, and for no explicable reason, decided to invent civilizations such as Sumer (and all its Mesopotamian offshoots) and Egypt out of whole cloth, undertake monumental ziggurat or pyramid construction, invent calendars, agriculture, wheels, writing, mathematics, music, astronomy, banking, and maybe even electricity, as evidenced by the Baghdad Battery.

  Consequently, when it comes right down to it, we have a choice between fairy tales, or, if one prefers, between mythologies or dogmas.

  We can believe the hypnotic incantations of biology, history, and anthropology professors waving their wands, and producing cute animated videos of the primordial soup gradually evolving into complex organic life (fish), whose fins gradually morph into limbs as they crawl out of the soup onto the sand (reptiles) and, as the computer-generated animation proceeds, gradually morphing into a veritable cornucopia of evolutionary progress over “billions of years” (insert Carl Sagan voice here).

  Or we can begin to take seriously what those ancient societies — that suddenly sprang up out of whole cloth and almost ex nihilo — said happened. There the picture is equally dis
concerting, for one is almost immediately confronted by wild tales of giants, monsters, men and even — if one reads the texts a certain way — with genetic manipulation and extraterrestrials, and a cast of characters that range the whole spectrum from nobility to a genocidal disposition and behavior that would make a Stalin or a Hitler seem like paragons of virtue, restraint, and compassion.

  Indeed, the comparison with Stalin and Hitler is an apt one, for if one reads certain ancient texts from Sumeria or India, one encounters over and over such characters, whether gods or men, engaged in a titanic struggle for power that ultimately resulted in a “cosmic war,” and its aftermath. Yet, if one is to believe the ancient stories, the monsters and giants and manipulations remained after that war was over, scattering themselves along with some of the technology by which it was fought, yet doing so with no consistency. For example, one finds both the Sumerian Anunnaki and the Hebrew Nephilim siring chimerical and gigantic offspring with human women, and yet the context in which the story is told — Sumerian “polytheism” versus Hebrew “monotheism” — changes drastically, and implies a hidden agenda (or agendas) behind each version of the story.

  This book looks at things from the standpoint of the second fairy tale; that is, it assumes that a very ancient “cosmic war” was fought within our own solar system, by a civilization with interplanetary extent, and which was based on this planet, the Moon, Mars, and various satellites of the gas giants. As I have detailed elsewhere, that war was so destructive that the civilization waging it was nearly wiped out, leaving its surviving elites to pick up the pieces as best as they could, and begin the long, slow climb back up to a similar pitch of scientific and technological development.1 The course of that war, and its aftermath, was populated by a bizarre pantheon of gods, of giants — the chimerical offspring of the “gods” and man — and by even more chimerical monsters, and of course, by humans. These, and the deeper implied issues of a sophisticated genetic science in existence in very ancient times, constitute the obvious motifs of this book. They are the portals by which we will enter into the central theme of this book, which is to acquire a preliminary understanding of the agendas of those elites that survived the cosmic war and catastrophe, and to trace a broad chronology of their activities.

  Thus, our focus is both on the elites and their agendas in the aftermath of that war, and with this, certain methodological assumptions are implicit. We assume, for example, that:1. Elites did survive, both in pockets scattered over the surface of the earth, and possibly in pockets altogether off this planet on other celestial bodies, wherever those might be;

  2. Like all elites, these had certain agendas, some of which it had to put into place immediately to ensure their, and humanity’s, survival, and some of which were of a more long-term nature, such as moving civilization by progressive steps back to a similar pitch of technological and scientific achievement as it had before the war. This would require a global extent to such a civilization, and all the trappings of civilized society, including, especially, agriculture and commerce.a. For the conduct of commerce, especially, an accurate system of weights and measures would be required, and this would have to be of fairly universal extent, and one moreover that was capable of simple and accurate reproduction anywhere on the planet. It is a typical “engineer’s optimalization” problem: how would one do so within the constraints posed by relatively simple and primitive tools that were probably the only tools left after the Cosmic War had all but blasted apart the infrastructure of whatever high civilization as once existed, and do so by deriving a method that would be extremely accurate, anywhere on the earth? The most obvious and ready-to-hand systems available would have been those based upon the relative constancy of astronomical and geodetic phenomena. As we shall discover in the main text, there is ample evidence to suggest that the earliest systems of measure were indeed based on these foundations, and once spread, the more long-term goal of civilization building began in sudden earnest.

  b. Similarly, as tools of cohesion, conquest, and a considerable degree of obfuscation, religions were promoted by the very same elites, and as commerce and contact between civilizations grew — often fostered by the very same elites — so too did religious agendas change, often violently, but just as often subtly. And here, suggestively, there were remarkable recreations of a lost technology by which oracles and revelations could, to a certain extent, be staged and coordinated. This is not a claim or assertion that all religions from that postbellum period, and which claim an oracular or revelatory foundation, are the products of an “oracular technology,” but only that some of them could be.

  3. The careful reader will have noticed yet another implicit assumption, and that is that in order for any such post-Cosmic War elites to function with such long-range goals, they must of necessity operate not only in a coordinated fashion, but in a fashion continuous over time and throughout history.2 They will, in short, have their modern descendants, and these too will evidence their own agendas, and while we will not often touch upon them in this book, we will encounter them at work in the first three chapters. Tracing the memberships and lineaments of those elites in ancient times is, of course, next to impossible if one hopes to dig up cuneiform “lists of secret members.” But one may approach the task by looking at the policies and practices of the known elites of those times, and there the picture becomes very suggestive if not completely persuasive: commerce, religion, and civilization itself were in the hands of an astronomical-astrological priesthood — complete with all the homosexual and heterosexual temple prostitution that accompanied it — and that elite worked with cold calculation behind the scenes to raise up, and to destroy, whole civilizations in pursuit of its ultimate goal: the reestablishment of a global civilization. That goal had to be reached, if humanity was ever to return to the stars, and reestablish contact with part of that pre-Cosmic War humanity — its “cousins” — with whom it had lost touch.

  This list of implicit methodological assumptions may be summarized by a series of simple questions that will be touched upon in this book: why does such an agenda (or agendas) even exist, who is behind it, and what is its purpose? What do the ancient stories and modern science say or imply about this agenda? Can what they say be harmonized? Perhaps last, but by no means least, what is the connection between this agenda and the “cosmic war of the gods” that preceded it?

  Such questions also highlight the technological themes of this book, for to suggest that elites existed with an agenda to manipulate humanity en masse via genetics, technologies, and religion, and to do so over a great period of time in order to reach a millennia-distant goal suggests at least rudimentary technologies and techniques had to be in place, and accordingly, we will look for evidence of these things in the archaeological record and the texts themselves. Additionally, I have already assumed the existence of a Very High Civilization that fought a cosmic interplanetary war, and even blew up a planet in our solar system, in my previous book The Cosmic War. Moreover, as I have argued in Babylon’s Banksters, there is abundant evidence that these elites were fully international in extent, that they manipulated both finance and religion themselves, and had a rudimentary technology of communication by which to do so.3 The implications of these assertions are rather obvious, for a civilization capable of blowing up entire planets implies a technological sophistication. But such sophistication also implies a similar nadir of development once existed in terms of social engineering and the technologies to manipulate man himself, that is to say, to manipulate his mind, his brain, and his very life processes — his DNA.

  I assume, therefore, in the main body of this work that some of these technologies, and particularly those of brain-mind manipulation, possibly survived for a brief period after that Cosmic War, or that they were at least reconstructed in rudimentary form. As such, the mere existence of the possibility of the use of such technologies in ancient times reveals not only the possible agendas of those elites, but also raises the vexing possibility that
the great “revelations,” beginning with Abram/Abraham and Moses, and the religions founded upon them, were nothing but the productions of a technology, and to serve an agenda more or less hidden from those being manipulated. As will be seen in the main body of this work, the reading of ancient texts in the light of modern technology inevitably poses a significant problem for religious apologetics of the revealed religions. The task of this book, however, lies not in apologetics, but in synoptics; the task is not to solve the apologetic dilemma but as thoroughly as possible to pose the questions and the problems.4

  These types of questions throw open the whole notion of what a “text” is, and how it might be interpreted. As I wrote in the predecessor to this book, The Cosmic War:Careful consideration of the questions outlined above, and of the parameters of the “interplanetary war scenario” itself, will also reveal the types of evidence to be considered...: (1) physics, (2) the material evidences of anomalous artifacts, (3) evidences and mechanisms of planetary destruction, and finally, and by no means the least important, (5) textual and “legendary” evidence from texts, oral myths and traditions, and physical monuments and ancient glyphs. “Text” in other words is understood in this book in the broadest sense, as being inclusive of all these things.5